Political online game and economic simulation

I've never tried it, but I heared that it increases petty crime and people tend to ignore security of their belongings. But crime can be controlled by tasks and keeping poverty in check. The police equipment task, the Organized crime (mafia) task, and the task which comes only after you implement administration reform, when you let the judiciary check the data if it's needed in a case.

Thank you for the response. I had the nagging feeling that there would be unintended consequences to this. I currently am away in California where they passed all kinds of laws such as "3 strikes" that had all kinds unforseen consequences and nearly bankrupted the state. What on the statewide level that commonly gets mistaken for "welfare" or " state bureaucrats" is actually the skyrocketing cost of the prison/police/industrial complex. No other state in the union imprisons more for petty crimes and imprisons for parole violations at four times the rate of the next highest state Texas.
I also can only wonder just how realistic it would be for a victim's fund. Could it be used to set up elaborate scams by the alleged victims? would it discourage responsibility and encourage the petty crimes? Most criminals are poor and certainly wont have trust funds to draw from so would the state be in effect subsidizing crime if the state compensated the victims? The more these questions pop up the more I am thinking this one may not be a good choice.
For my state I already have a low crime rate and I may just bypass this reform. I feel that it is better to hold back than just enact everything for the sake of doing so and risk something unforseen happening.