Political online game and economic simulation

I just wanted to know what's the controlling party in ars-regendi. I personally am neither, Im a true independent, not one of those people who say their independent but always vote for one party. For example, when someone told me they are apart of the independent party but for the last 30yrs. voted for republican candidates. I dont like either, but to be honest in this type of economy I would vote for moderates (democrats) over republicans, I mean I like alotof the past republicans but I dont like todays republicans.

Green Party

For the Germans in here, could you explain the tea party please?

I will do that:

Wie man hier sieht mangelt es der Bewegung doch ziemlich stark an grundlegendem Menschenverstand. Die wollen das Defizit reduzieren bei gleichzeitigen Steuersenkungen und ohne nennenswerte Ausgabenkürzungen, siehe weiterführen der beiden Kriege und ablehnen der Gesundheitsreform (welche ja langfristig die Neuverschuldung reduzieren soll). . Man sieht die Bewegung strotzt geradezu vor intellektuellem Scharfsinn.

Die Bewegung hat zudem großes Aufsehen erregt mit ihren Protesten gegen Obamas Gesundheitsreform, diese sei Sozialismus und Obama dementsprechend ein Sozialist, mit Hitler hat man ihn auch schon verglichen. Ein großer Teil der Bewegung kommt aus dem rechten Lager (über 90% Republikaner) zum Teil auch rechts außen. Die bekannteste Unterstützerin dürfte Sarah Palin sein - allein das sollte schon ausreichen um von der Bewegung Abstand zu nehmen.

Das sagt auch so einiges.

Ich nehme an, dass du recht gute Englischkenntnisse besitzt, daher empfehle ich dir folgendes Video zum Thema:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if88PgI-vfU

At first I hope we all know that the Iraq war is based on a lie and Saddam never was an islamist or connected to them. So I have to agree if you say the war in Iraq and the killing of Saddam was a crime, but i have to say that some of the non muslims in Iraq are afraid of the future now and that they will become islamic law like in Iran or Afghanistan and I think they are right with that. Now I have given you the reason to say, that you can't stop the war if you really want to make a free country out of Iraq.
The war in Afghanistan was right from the beginning, cause the Taliban all have to be killed for the crimes they made and not one of them should survive, this is a holy war against the Devil himself.
If the Taliban would be able to rule again, it would be better to be some pet, than to be a women in Afghanistan. Under the Taliban regime women have to wear the Burka all the time and even then, they are not allowed to leave the house without a male companion. There is no sanitation for woman, cause they are not allowed to work or go to school and it is forbidden to male doctors to see them nude or touch them in any way. To all people it is forbidden to watch tv, draw pictures of animals or people, listen to or make music, except singing songs to praise Allah, but musical instruments are generally forbidden.
This is the harder way of Equilibrium if you know that film.
http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/taliban.html
So finally I'm with the Tea Party, even if the beginning of the Iraq war was wrong, the war in Afghanistan is totally right an the war in Iraq must have a positive ending, securing Iraq, or soon the Taliban will rule Iraq too. At least left wingers are producing lie over lie about Miss Palin, like they always do if someone stands up for the truth, media is always left winged, may it be America or Europe. If Obama has a secret Agenda, it is to islamise the world and America, to control and enslave the people, Islamism is the religion of the NWO, the religion of Equilibrium, so listen to Geert Wilders too and be prepared to protect your freedom.
Finally i have to say if you lower the taxes, the economy will grow, so you will get more money at the end.

STALINIST ANTIREVISIONIST

I disagree, the starting a war in Iraq was wrong and the ending was as good as we could have hoped for, but starting a war in Afgan. was wrong because the country is so unstable that the taliban would eventually come back into power slowly but surely, but the taliban would have never taken over Iraq, Iraq was a stable dictatorship that the people of Iraq was content with, we didnt need to go help people that didnt want it. Also the theory of Obama trying to enslave us and make us worship islam is very ignorant and isnt worth refuding.

Lowering taxes does grow the economy if you lower them for everybody not just the top 2%, look at it this way, if a middle-class family get a tax cut they will spend it, if a millionare gets a tax cut they will not, because they dont have to.

The talibans were trying to halt opium production, while Saddam was no longer cooperating with the corrupt oligarchs, that's why he became a problem. It's not about saving people from an evil dictatorship, even though it was cruel. The national interest of the people of the US, is not war with Afghanistan, or Iraq, or Iran. Remmeber how the East India Company (transnational corporatism) worked, through running opium and slave trade, any commercial route, that they didn't posses was considered an enemy and those who made/had that route were enemies to the empire.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLE...aqwar.html

I prefer the ecological left. http://www.oekologische-linke.de/image/E...mation.pdf

My Vote Goes To Republican because i like Their Policies.