Post Reply  Post Thread 
Pages (58): « First < Previous 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next > Last »

Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

Author Message
HUNDmiau
Unicorn of Leftism
**


Posts: 869
Words count: 100,368
Group: Premium
Joined: Aug2015
Status: Offline
Reputation: 42
Experience: 704
Glory Points: 200
Medals: 8

Post: #21
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

So, bin jetzt eine theokratische Republikföderation. Die Heiligen Römischen Republiken Deutschlands

08.12.2018 17:13
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
optimus rex
Admin
******


Posts: 11,575
Words count: 789,358
Group: Admin
Joined: Apr2008
Status: Offline
Reputation: 188
Experience: 222847
Glory Points: 1915
Medals: 97

Tickloser Test
Westmarken III
NoReforms
Human I
No Reforms II
Post: #22
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

Klingt interessant! Daumenhoch

10.12.2018 14:56
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Alexei B.Miller
Co President of the Ros'Gaz Union State
*


Posts: 3,470
Words count: 515,575
Group: Basic
Joined: May2011
Status: Offline
Reputation: 70
Experience: 6020
Glory Points: 525
Medals: 20

Post: #23
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

With playership down, how do we ensure a pleasurable world experience without creating scorned players new and old? Do we agree to good stewardship rules, or create conditions to ensure players remain in game. I suggest new regents who collapse due to economic issues be relocated to Africa/S. America (if they are active and somewhat engaged).

Going forward in the era of lower player engagement would now be a good time to suggest consolidating some territories on the map (for example Kazakhstan could be unified) and reducing the number of required states?


"Hitler wanted to destroy Russia, everyone needs to remember how that ended"

Vladimir Putin

13.12.2018 14:28
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HUNDmiau
Unicorn of Leftism
**


Posts: 869
Words count: 100,368
Group: Premium
Joined: Aug2015
Status: Offline
Reputation: 42
Experience: 704
Glory Points: 200
Medals: 8

Post: #24
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

Why? If someone fails in a normal game, it should be up to the rest of playerbase to decide wether to invade a nation to give it to him or not. We should not create some pre-game rules for this. It not only kills the possibility of failure, but also makes the game quite dull. If someone is wished to be kept, they should be kept with already existing game rules if someone sees it as worthy. Or shortly: No.

13.12.2018 16:50
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Alexei B.Miller
Co President of the Ros'Gaz Union State
*


Posts: 3,470
Words count: 515,575
Group: Basic
Joined: May2011
Status: Offline
Reputation: 70
Experience: 6020
Glory Points: 525
Medals: 20

Post: #25
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

HUNDmiau Wrote:
Why? If someone fails in a normal game, it should be up to the rest of playerbase to decide wether to invade a nation to give it to him or not. We should not create some pre-game rules for this. It not only kills the possibility of failure, but also makes the game quite dull. If someone is wished to be kept, they should be kept with already existing game rules if someone sees it as worthy. Or shortly: No.


Why? for the reasons I explained already.

Also if you don't wish to participate that's fine, I will form this policy with other regular players and you don't have to be apart of it or eligible for the conditions of it. It really shows your true colors as a player.


"Hitler wanted to destroy Russia, everyone needs to remember how that ended"

Vladimir Putin

13.12.2018 16:57
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Esser14
@realAttilaJuhász
*


Posts: 2,259
Words count: 203,638
Group: Basic
Joined: May2014
Status: Offline
Reputation: 153
Experience: 8483
Glory Points: 3085
Medals: 87

Heilige Ordnung
Communism
Braunia
Zhonghua
Goa
Post: #26
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

So you both suggest that other players should conquer a new state at the request of an active player who has lost his state. Do I understand correctly that you just don't agree whether the other players should do this voluntarily or be obliged to do so? We can't force anybody to conquer a state for another player anyway, so it's definitely voluntary. How else are you going to decide who is going to carry out this operation? I don't understand what you're arguing about, could you explain that to me?

13.12.2018 19:52
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HUNDmiau
Unicorn of Leftism
**


Posts: 869
Words count: 100,368
Group: Premium
Joined: Aug2015
Status: Offline
Reputation: 42
Experience: 704
Glory Points: 200
Medals: 8

Post: #27
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

No. I disagree on the whole policy of making everything out before. Let things happen naturally. Let the experience change your gameplay aswell as the other way around. If we manage every single possible problem beforehand, we could forget about this game alltogether, and simply do the simulation in our head.

I want this to be unorganized. Just as it was last time with me when another player offered it to me. A player should not be entilted to being resurrected, no matter how good they are.

13.12.2018 20:20
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RSIV
Member
***


Posts: 173
Words count: 53,308
Group: VIP
Joined: Apr2016
Status: Offline
Reputation: 17
Experience: 110
Glory Points: 0
Medals: 0

Post: #28
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

Ich persönlich denke, dass HUNDmiau Recht hat. Es ist besser sich nicht zuviel im Vorfeld auszumachen, denn sonst wird das Spiel nicht so spannend. Ist aber nur meine Einschätzung. Spiele ja das erste Mal in einer Welt.

I personally think, that HUNDmiau is right. It is better not to make so many rules before the game Starts, because the game maybe gets boring. But it's only what I personally think. Maybe I'm wrong, because I play for the first time in a world.

14.12.2018 00:52
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Alexei B.Miller
Co President of the Ros'Gaz Union State
*


Posts: 3,470
Words count: 515,575
Group: Basic
Joined: May2011
Status: Offline
Reputation: 70
Experience: 6020
Glory Points: 525
Medals: 20

Post: #29
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

@Esser- I was told the world would start at 50 regents and the remainder would be computer states. I was suggesting we conquer the computer state for the fallen regent.


"Hitler wanted to destroy Russia, everyone needs to remember how that ended"

Vladimir Putin

14.12.2018 04:27
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HUNDmiau
Unicorn of Leftism
**


Posts: 869
Words count: 100,368
Group: Premium
Joined: Aug2015
Status: Offline
Reputation: 42
Experience: 704
Glory Points: 200
Medals: 8

Post: #30
RE: Off-RP-Thread [Off-Game | Q&A]

Depending on the nation I get, I will get myself some sweet sweet vassals. Gotta spread peace, love and christianity by force.

14.12.2018 20:16
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pages (58): « First < Previous 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next > Last »
Post Reply  Post Thread 

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Die Likedeeler ORGA THREAD Aslan1990 0 412 15.08.2018 21:16
Last Post: Aslan1990

View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe to this Thread | Add Thread to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump: