Post Reply  Post Thread 

The real, fundamental, cause of low growth in developed economies

Author Message
CommieScum
Member
*


Posts: 68
Words count: 12,806
Group: Basic
Joined: Apr2017
Status: Offline
Reputation: 2
Experience: 25
Glory Points: 0
Medals: 0

Post: #1
The real, fundamental, cause of low growth in developed economies

The true, fundamental, cause of low growth in developed countries is the typical access to an abundance of resources to all on the social scale. In other words, the true cause is a lack of impoverished peoples. Poverty is the greatest incentive to getting out of poverty; without it, people have little incentive to take large risk in developing their human capital, such as taking on a new career or starting up a small business (the ultimate risk). What we define as "impoverished" in this country is extraordinarily different than that in different countries. In India, for example, "not being in poverty" could be as simple as having access to fresh water. In Great Britain, it is as simple as having access to things like phones, computers, and the Internet, and even higher education, things and services which would be considered immense luxuries and wealth in other countries. The drive for human capital which was present 100 years ago, likewise, no longer exists to the same extent in developed countries. Fundamentally, achieving something like 5% growth is now near impossible; society, the individuals, themselves, do not desire said development, the desire of politicians. In the end, we are countries of individuals, not "economic theory" or dolls for the lauded snobby intellectual class which rules over us. The capacity of developing is directly correlative to the amount of poverty in a country. As the reserve pool of impoverished or "have-nots" dries up, so does economic development, at least in any sense that we could comprehend.

15.05.2017 15:38
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Akeron
Senior Member
*


Posts: 442
Words count: 55,516
Group: Basic
Joined: Jun2009
Status: Offline
Reputation: 9
Experience: 151
Glory Points: 0
Medals: 0

Post: #2
RE: The real, fundamental, cause of low growth in developed economies

Poverty is also very depressing since it convinces people that life is miserable.

People want to improve themselves because they have ambitions, goals, and dreams. It's not that they're trying to escape misery, but that they're trying to become happy.

Developing countries are advancing because they're piggybacking off the achievements of developed countries right now. We saw this in Japan before that prioritized innovation before invention, we see it in China now with reverse engineering, and we see it in India that takes advantage of its familiarity with the British Empire and connections with American technology firms.


Why return? That's a good question.
29.06.2017 06:46
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
velazquez
Junior Member
*


Posts: 22
Words count: 0
Group: Basic
Joined: Apr2020
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
Experience: 70
Glory Points: 0
Medals: 0

Wessex II
Novgorod II
Post: #3
RE: The real, fundamental, cause of low growth in developed economies

I respectfully disagree. Back 100 years ago, economic growth year on year was at about 3%, despite there being a greater incentive to get out of poverty. This 2-1% economic growth experienced in the west comes from a multitude of factors.

During the 50's-70's, Keynesian economics was adopted in the west and largely successful. Mind you, I'm not saying Keynesian economics works in all aspects, but the way it was used in the post war industrial boom proved extremely effective. Across the west, nations experienced an average of 5% growth a year. At the time, the balance of a very entrepreneurial society combined with an adequate safety net and policy that encouraged the worker to benefit the most from industrial progress led to the largest growth of the western middle class in poverty. It also saw poverty rates drop to 6% in the United States. More specifically, high taxes on the rich and tight regulation on buybacks allowed money that the rich would rather sit on to be put to good work by efficient government spending on infrastructure and social welfare programs.

The oil crisis of 73 and the recession of 76 proved detrimental to western economies. The lack of energy security slowed industrial society to a halt. Consequently, these crisis's drained a lot of what little wealth was kept by the top. Desperate to never again see their incomes disappear, they began to lobby for people who would reduce their tax burden and allow them to get away with economic practices that only served their interests (Reagan and Thatcher for ex.).

The new policy passed by the Reagan administration resulted in a slower economy. Gone were the days of 3% pay-raises every year, and the days of constant productivity boom. Given that 1 dollar to the rich only puts back 39 cents into the economy, the rich in effect sat on their money a lot more. In addition, a lot of the policy in this era paradoxically legalized financial crime. Now, rich investors in Africa found it easy to conduct tax evasion and shift money into foreign bank secrecy accounts, which robbed Africa of 900 billion dollars of revenue out of its total of 1.2 trillion. In a way, its rather policy passed in the eighties robbed many developing nations of their ability to industrialize quickly, while simultaneously destroying the economic and industrial superpowers of the world at the time: the United States and the United Kingdom.

Because of the situation created by such policy, we are now seeing a dangerous divide of wealth inequality in the United States. The rise of the super-rich has given them more influence in government, increasing corruption across the world. In addition, the rise of trillion dollar multinational corporations crush small business competitors through tax loopholes and lobbying much of which they fund. Overall, this has caused the business environment in the west to deteriorate, caused many governments to slowly transition from democracy to plutocracy, and is leaving many stimulus programs useless, racking up national debts worldwide, a dangerous precedent for the future.

Therefore, in order to solve the issue of slow growth in the west, we must simultaneously tackle corruption, improve the business environment, reinvigorate antitrust, and remove any incentives that hamper wage and productivity growth.

23.04.2020 21:19
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply  Post Thread 

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Economics is not a real science (xpost r/badphilosophy) gamora77 4 817 07.04.2020 22:37
Last Post: dragonflare89
  Money Growth Does Not Cause Inflation! Helsworth 18 4,922 26.09.2017 02:04
Last Post: Hilder
  China Fast-Tracks $1 Trillion in Projects to Spur Growth Helsworth 7 2,133 07.09.2015 21:07
Last Post: Alexei B.Miller
  Warren Mosler in Poland, Q&A: bitcoin, the euro, real wealth, and deficits Helsworth 0 1,419 01.07.2014 13:23
Last Post: Helsworth
  The real face of Bill Gates and Davos Helsworth 27 3,156 25.02.2014 00:03
Last Post: Helsworth
  European Central Bank celebrates 0,02% growth potential of trade agreement Helsworth 1 1,308 27.09.2013 00:50
Last Post: TriniSary
  The Great Depression in Europe: Real GDP Data for 22 nations Helsworth 0 1,171 07.07.2013 13:55
Last Post: Helsworth
  MacroEconomic Conceptual Visualizations (How the real economy works) Helsworth 5 1,468 26.04.2013 08:05
Last Post: Khieu Samphan
  Ron Paul tells the real reason for the oil prices (sort of) Helsworth 2 1,159 16.04.2013 23:04
Last Post: Helsworth
  Why deflation and growth can't happen indefinitely Helsworth 6 1,337 12.03.2013 08:46
Last Post: Helsworth

View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe to this Thread | Add Thread to Favorites

Forum Jump: